- Home
- West Bengal
- Kolkata
- Cal HC On Abhishek Banerjee: সুপ্রিমের পর কলকাতা হাইকোর্টেও স্বস্তিতে অভিষেক বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়, বাড়ল রক্ষাকবচের মেয়াদ
Cal HC On Abhishek Banerjee: সুপ্রিমের পর কলকাতা হাইকোর্টেও স্বস্তিতে অভিষেক বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়, বাড়ল রক্ষাকবচের মেয়াদ
Cal HC On Abhishek Banerjee: After the Supreme Court's relief, Diamond Harbour Trinamool MP Abhishek Banerjee has got more relief. The court has extended Abhishek's protection till August 31. What did the Calcutta High Court say?
অন্তর্বর্তী রক্ষাকবচে ফের স্বস্তিতে অভিষেক বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়
The High Court has granted interim protection in the three cases filed against Abhishek Banerjee in Kalitala, Bishnupur and Bhavanipur police stations till August 31. 'If there had been no change in the political tide in the state, could you have made this allegation? So, the reality should not be denied. You could have conducted custodial interrogation before May 4. If the FIR is filed so late, the court will intervene. The complainant has already been attacked. So, where is the problem if he is asked to cooperate?' - asked Justice Saugata Bhattacharya.
অভিষেকের মামলায় কী বলল আদালত?
The Supreme Court had allowed him to go abroad for eye treatment. Abhishek Banerjee also got relief from the High Court on Tuesday. The High Court has now granted protection in 16 FIRs filed against him. Out of these, Abhishek had already received protection in 13 cases. On Tuesday, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya granted protection to the Trinamool MP from Diamond Harbour in the three cases against Abhishek in the remaining Kalitala, Bishnupur and Bhavanipur police stations till August 31.
রক্ষাকবচের বিরোধিতা
During the hearing of the case today, the state lawyer and Additional Solicitor SV Raju opposed the protection and again claimed that there should be no interim order, but an application for anticipatory bail for Abhishek. Therefore, this case is not acceptable. Justice Bhattacharya counter-questioned the Additional Solicitor General, saying that if the court does not grant interim protection in this case, then the interim protection granted by the court in the DJ controversy case will become meaningless.
আর্থিক দুর্নীতির অভিযোগ রয়েছে অভিষেকের বিরুদ্ধে
SV Raju countered that there are allegations of financial corruption in illegal mining against Abhishek. Justice Bhattacharya questioned the filing of an FIR after a long time and said, "Did Abhijit Das (Bobby), who lost the election against Abhishek Banerjee, make these allegations? See when the FIRs were filed? Isn't this enough to issue an interim stay order! Let the police investigate like the police. The court also wants to see how much progress has been made in the investigation." Then SV Raju countered and said, “Just because the FIR was filed late, it will get protection, it is not the law. This case has no acceptability.”
অভিষেক বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়কে মামলায় সহযোগিতা করার বার্তা
However, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya did not agree to this claim or allegation. He countered the opposition lawyers, 'If there had not been a change in the political tide in the state, would you have made this allegation? So the reality should not be denied. You could have conducted custodial interrogation before May 4. If the FIR is filed so late, the court will intervene. The complainant has already been attacked. So where is the problem if he is asked to cooperate?
কী বলল কলকাতা হাইকোর্ট?
State lawyer SV Raju requested the court not to issue any interim orders without the case diary. But after hearing the statement of Justice Saugata Bhattacharya, he ordered interim protection till August 31 in the three cases filed against Abhishek Banerjee in Kalitala, Bishnupur and Bhavanipur police stations.
